If any muslims wishes to be ruled by sharia rather than American law, they need to GTFO of here and go live someplace where sharia is ALREADY the law and stop trying to cram their barbaric death cult rules down our throats. We have our own laws here and they need to apply equally to everybody because failure to do so would be discrimination.
It is NOT OK to try to kill us for your stupid cult, no matter what your filthy disgusting unholy book says. If you don't like it, too freaking bad, leave, and take your damned jihad with you.
H/T: Tlchimes of Blue Jeans and Lace who sent me these two articles:
Underwear bomb suspect claims wrongful imprisonment by U.S., files for release
'Underwear' bomb suspect claims assault on guards, seeks Quran judgment
This post is linked at Atlas Shrugs. Thank you, Pamela!
This post is linked at Winds of Jihad. Thanks, SheikYerMami!
This post is linked at Jihad Watch. Thank you, Marisol!
This post is linked at iOwntheWorld. Thanks, BigFurHat!
This post is linked at The Gateway Pundit. Thank you, Jim!
This post is linked at The Patriot Underground. Thanks, Doug!
This post is linked at The Patriot Underground. Thanks, Doug!
This post is linked at Moonbattery. Thank you, Dave!
This post is linked at Lisa Graas. Thanks. Lisa!
This post is linked at Lisa Graas. Thanks. Lisa!
Buy Ad Space
.
21 comments:
I knew you would make good use of this creep... he gets off too easy just because he screwed up. It's all so swept under the rug.... yet it could have been real bad.
Yep, if he'd have succeeded, not only would he have killed the people on the plane, but likely tons more on the ground as well!
Thanks for the tip!
What's even stupider is the possibility that our idiot islamoblow government might actually take such stupid demands seriously! Cases have already been ruled using islamic ratehr than American law, such as the case in NJ where it was ruled that it was OK when a man raped and beat his wife because he is muslim! It was later over turned, but still, and there are many, MANY more such cases!
BTW, I had to re-login for the first time in many months. Has there been the various options (FB, Disqus, OpenID, etc) for login for some time ?
Sharing this !!
Think about who was on the ground that lives not to far from the airport.... me and mine could have been one of the hurt.... no way am I going to let that silly book he follows come above the safety of my family. *mother dragon voice used here*
"Mother Dragon" voice ! Yep, that oughta do it !
I have had the same problem several times since yesterday at The Other McCain, I think DISQUS is still working out bugs from their last maintenance thingy.
I was just curious about the "Options" for login, are they new, or fancied up ? Not bothered that I had to. It`s common at some blogs and w/s.
The option has always been there to the best of my knowledge, I dunno if there were always so many choices though.
Thanks!
Hell yeah.
Kthnx !
How is the human dog sled tonight ? ;-) Sore still, I`m sure, but is your hand broken / cracked ? Black n blue ? You didn`t say this morning; did you sleep well at all last night ? I`m sure we all hope you rest well tonight !
The answer here is simple: Since this fellow says he doesn't want to be judged by American law, he should not have the protections of American law.
I think that this guy is a complete idiot. So much so that I don't think he did this alone.
Just to remind everyone how this went down, this guy is the son of a prominent Nigerian bankster who went to the US embassy to warn them that he was hanging with terrorists in Yemen. This would normally get one on the no-fly list instantly in the computer age, but he was allowed to fly.
Hearings for the Homeland Security failure were held and Napolitano failed to show up and send a lackey in her place. During these hearings, State Dept officials were questioned in how this guy got a visa and was not put on the don't fly list. Undersecretary Kennedy is on record with the following:
REP. THOMPSON: Okay. So — all right. So he has a visa. So what does that do? In the process, does it revoke the visa? Does it —
MR. KENNEDY: We — as I mentioned in my statement, Mr. Chairman, if we
unilaterally revoked a visa — and there was a case recently up — we
have a request from a law enforcement agency to not revoke the visa. We
came across information; we said this is a dangerous person. We were
ready to revoke the visa. We then went to the community and said, should
we revoke this visa? And one of the members — and we’d be glad
to give you that out of — in private — said, please do not revoke this
visa. We have eyes on this person. We are following this person who has
the visa for the purpose of trying roll up an entire network, not just
stop one person. So we will revoke the visa of any individual
who is a threat to the United States, but we do take one preliminary
step. We ask our law enforcement and intelligence community partners, do
you have eyes on this person, and so you want us to let this person
proceed under your surveillance so that you may potentially break a
larger plot?
This case is interesting because the fellow passengers on that flight said that idiot-dude-whatshisname was accompanied by well-dressed official looking man and was not given the same scrutiny as the other passengers in getting on. They kind of made an odd couple, which is probably why the passengers were able to react quickly to the exploding underwear, as they were watching.
The very next week the naked body scanners were on order, with former DHS secretary Chertoff getting a handsome kickback.
What I want to know, was who gave him the explosives? Who else was in the network that Kennedy says was of interest so that they let him fly? Maybe I'm just a weird inquiring mind...
Nothing broken, I don't think, just sore, cut & bruised. Because my regular pain problem keeps me up at night, I have a prescription to knock me out on nights when I think my little guy will not be waking me up a million times during the night, so I took that and was out cold. ;)
Sounds good to me.
Excellent observations and great information! Of course we've seen nothing about all of that in our dhimmimedia!
You tell him!
Let me see. If my hard drive serves me correctly, sharia calls for stoning or having ones head removed by a bearded guy wearing laundry on his head using a dull rusty knife.
I think we should give our abused jihadi which ever one he likes.
Update:
FOX 2 Detroit According to the Associated Press, the accused "underwear bomber" from Christmas 2009 says he was working on behalf of al-Qaeda.
Post a Comment